Miller v. Cassini
This text of 259 A.D. 118 (Miller v. Cassini) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
All the allegations of fraud are not mere generalities. Assuming as we must that all the allegations of the pleading are true, it sufficiently states a defense and counterclaim to the action and should not have been stricken out. (Mersereau v. Simon, 255 App. Div. 997.)
The order so far as appealed from should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with leave to the plaintiff to reply within ten days after service of order on payment of said costs.
Present ■ — • Mabtin, P. J., Glennon, Dobe, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with leave to the plaintiff to reply within ten days after service of order on payment of said costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
259 A.D. 118, 18 N.Y.S.2d 454, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6065, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-cassini-nyappdiv-1940.