Mersereau v. Simon
This text of 255 A.D. 997 (Mersereau v. Simon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— -Order dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a cause of action reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs; defendant to have ten days to serve his answer after the entry of the order hereon. Assuming the allegations of the complaint to be true, it states a cause of action. (Dunn v. Chambers, 4 Barb. 376; Roux v. Rothschild, 37 Misc. 435; Schwarz v. Reznick, 257 Ill. 479; 100 N. E. 900.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
255 A.D. 997, 8 N.Y.S.2d 534, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mersereau-v-simon-nyappdiv-1938.