Mersereau v. Simon
255 A.D. 997, 8 N.Y.S.2d 534, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6209
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 16, 1938·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
— -Order dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a cause of action reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs; defendant to have ten days to serve his answer after the entry of the order hereon. Assuming the allegations of the complaint to be true, it states a cause of action. (Dunn v. Chambers, 4 Barb. 376; Roux v. Rothschild, 37 Misc. 435; Schwarz v. Reznick, 257 Ill. 479; 100 N. E. 900.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mersereau v. Simon, 255 A.D. 997, 8 N.Y.S.2d 534, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6209 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).
255 A.D. 997 (Mersereau v. Simon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miller v. Cassini
259 A.D. 118 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)
Mersereau v. Mastan Co.
258 A.D. 990 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)