Miller v. Antelope County

52 N.W. 1116, 35 Neb. 237, 1892 Neb. LEXIS 279
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 21, 1892
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 52 N.W. 1116 (Miller v. Antelope County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. Antelope County, 52 N.W. 1116, 35 Neb. 237, 1892 Neb. LEXIS 279 (Neb. 1892).

Opinion

Norval, J.

The plaintiff in error presented to the county board of Antelope county an account for $44.50- for medical services rendered by him to one Christian Mosher, a pauper, at the request of E. F. Skinner, a justice of the peace of said •county, which claim was rejected by the board, and Miller •appealed from the decision to the district court. Upon the trial there the court found the issues for the county and rendered judgment, dismissing the action.

The petition in error contains two assignments:

First — The court erred in admitting the evidence of the witness T. W. Dennis.

Second — The findings are not sustained by sufficient evidence.

‘We are precluded from examining either of the errors assigned, for the reason no motion lor a new trial was made in the court below. The filing of such a motion was indispensable, in order to review the rulings of the court on the admission or rejection of testimony, or to secure a review of the evidence for the purpose of determining whether [238]*238it-sustains the finding and judgment. (Cropsey v. Wiggenhorn, 3 Neb., 108; Hosford v. Stone, 6 Id., 380; Lichty v. Clark, 10 Id., 472; Cruts v. Wray, 19 Id., 581; Weitz v. Wolfe, 28 Id., 500.)

As neither of the errors assigned .can be considered by this court, for the reason stated, the judgment of the district court must be

Affirmed.

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Silver
78 N.W. 725 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1899)
Hake v. Woolner
75 N.W. 1087 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1898)
Shaw v. Robinson & Stokes Co.
70 N.W. 953 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1897)
Scroggin v. National Lumber Co.
59 N.W. 548 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1894)
Dillon v. State
57 N.W. 986 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 N.W. 1116, 35 Neb. 237, 1892 Neb. LEXIS 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-antelope-county-neb-1892.