Miller Safe Co. v. Commissioner
This text of 12 B.T.A. 1388 (Miller Safe Co. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
[1390]*1390OPINION.
The question is not, as argued by petitioner, whether the item was interest which accrued for the first time in the period in question when it was put on petitioner’s books, but rather, whether it accrued at all as interest. The petitioner, under the stipulated facts, was under no obligation to pay interest during prior years because there was no súch agreement. The stockholder was apparently advancing money without interest for reasons of his own. When the corporation resolved to pay him “ interest ” it was a gratuitous act. Strictly the amount was not interest.
The statute should not lightly be construed to permit interest, which ordinarily would accrue ratably so as to be deductible proportionately, to be piled up for deduction in a year when taxes become important — especially when the debtor and creditor are so closely related that their interests are largely at one. The respondent was. correct.
Reviewed by the Board.
Judgment will be entered under Bule 60.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 B.T.A. 1388, 1928 BTA LEXIS 3350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-safe-co-v-commissioner-bta-1928.