Miller Brewing Co. v. Florida Department of Business Regulation, Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Miller Brewing Co. v. Florida Department of Business Regulation, Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco

527 So. 2d 891, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1464, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2599, 1988 WL 62177

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 22, 1988

DocketNo. 88-75

StatusPublished

This text of 527 So. 2d 891 (Miller Brewing Co. v. Florida Department of Business Regulation, Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller Brewing Co. v. Florida Department of Business Regulation, Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco, 527 So. 2d 891, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1464, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2599, 1988 WL 62177 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Miller Brewing Company appeals a final order of the circuit court which found that Miller, a Wisconsin brewer, was subject to the provisions of section 563.022, Florida Statutes (1987). Before briefing was completed, however, the parties filed a joint motion to vacate and remand, showing that the 1988 Florida Legislature has amended the statutory provisions here at issue so as to render this appeal moot. Accordingly, we grant the motion and reverse and remand to the trial court with directions to dismiss the complaint as moot, Fritz v. City of Hialeah, 411 So.2d 973 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

SMITH, C.J., and JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Miller Brewing Company appeals a final order of the circuit court which found that Miller, a Wisconsin brewer, was subject to the provisions of section 563.022, Florida Statutes (1987). Before briefing was completed, however, the parties filed a joint motion to vacate and remand, showing that the 1988 Florida Legislature has amended the statutory provisions here at issue so as to render this appeal moot. Accordingly, we grant the motion and reverse and remand to the trial court with directions to dismiss the complaint as moot, Fritz v. City of Hialeah, 411 So.2d 973 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

SMITH, C.J., and JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

527 So. 2d 891, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1464, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2599, 1988 WL 62177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-brewing-co-v-florida-department-of-business-regulation-division-fladistctapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack