Fritz v. City of Hialeah
This text of 411 So. 2d 973 (Fritz v. City of Hialeah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It appearing to the court that during the pendency of the appeal the matter has become moot, the trial court’s judgment is vacated and the cause remanded with directions that the cause be dismissed. See United States v. Munsingwear, 340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950); Town of Palm Beach v. Gradison, 298 So.2d 443 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); Town of Palm Beach v. First Bank and Trust Co. of Boca Raton, 298 So.2d 443 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); Town of Palm Beach v. Royal Palm Beach Hotel, Inc., 298 So.2d 439 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974).
Remanded with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
411 So. 2d 973, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fritz-v-city-of-hialeah-fladistctapp-1982.