Milledge v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Milledge v. State

83 So. 3d 983, 2012 WL 1020514, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4851

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 28, 2012·No. No. 1D11-6231·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is granted in part. On or before April 12, 2012, the circuit court shall rule on the pending motion to discharge counsel. Because we are confident that the circuit court will issue a ruling, we withhold issuance of the formal writ.

Inasmuch as the petition seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the lower tribunal to rule on Petitioner’s 3.850 motion, it is denied. See Munn v. Florida Parole Commission, 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

ROBERTS, CLARK, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is granted in part. On or before April 12, 2012, the circuit court shall rule on the pending motion to discharge counsel. Because we are confident that the circuit court will issue a ruling, we withhold issuance of the formal writ.

Inasmuch as the petition seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the lower tribunal to rule on Petitioner’s 3.850 motion, it is denied. See Munn v. Florida Parole Commission, 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

ROBERTS, CLARK, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Milledge v. State, 83 So. 3d 983, 2012 WL 1020514, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4851 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

83 So. 3d 983 (Milledge v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related