Millan v. State
2 So. 3d 1115, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1284, 2009 WL 383647
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Millan v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 932 So. 2d 557 →
Opinion
David Millan’s Petition for Writ of Ha-beas Corpus is denied. It is unlikely the outcome of this case would have been different but for the alleged omission that Millan claims was made by his appellate counsel. The error, if any, is harmless. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); see Millan v. State, 932 So.2d 557 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).
Petition denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Millan v. State, 2 So. 3d 1115, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1284, 2009 WL 383647 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
2 So. 3d 1115 (Millan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Millan v. State
932 So. 2d 557 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)