Millan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Millan v. State

2 So. 3d 1115, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1284, 2009 WL 383647

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 18, 2009

DocketNo. 3D08-3227

StatusPublished

This text of 2 So. 3d 1115 (Millan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Millan v. State, 2 So. 3d 1115, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1284, 2009 WL 383647 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David Millan’s Petition for Writ of Ha-beas Corpus is denied. It is unlikely the outcome of this case would have been different but for the alleged omission that Millan claims was made by his appellate counsel. The error, if any, is harmless. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); see Millan v. State, 932 So.2d 557 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).

Petition denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

David Millan’s Petition for Writ of Ha-beas Corpus is denied. It is unlikely the outcome of this case would have been different but for the alleged omission that Millan claims was made by his appellate counsel. The error, if any, is harmless. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); see Millan v. State, 932 So.2d 557 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).

Petition denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 So. 3d 1115, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1284, 2009 WL 383647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/millan-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack