Millan v. State

954 So. 2d 683, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 5425, 2007 WL 1093524
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Millan v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 932 So. 2d 557
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 13, 2007·No. No. 5D06-1303·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a sexual offender who is also a sexual predator, challenges his conviction for failure to comply with statutory registration requirements. Because the State charged Appellant with violating a statute that does not apply to him, the conviction must be reversed.

The State filed an information charging Appellant with failure of a sexual offender to report a change in residence pursuant to subsections 943.0485(4) and 943.0435(9), Florida Statutes (2004). It is undisputed, however, that, although Appellant is a sexual offender, he is also a sexual predator. Because section 943.0435, by its express terms, “does not apply to a sexual offender who is also a sexual predator,” Appellant cannot be convicted of the crime with which he was charged, and the trial court erred when it denied Appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal. § 943.0435(5), Fla. Stat. (2004).

REVERSED.

TORPY, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Millan v. State, 954 So. 2d 683, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 5425, 2007 WL 1093524 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

954 So. 2d 683 (Millan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.