Miles v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Miles v. State

1920 OK CR 6, 186 P. 489, 16 Okla. Crim. 725, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 13

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 10, 1920

DocketNo. A-3400.

StatusPublished

This text of 1920 OK CR 6 (Miles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miles v. State, 1920 OK CR 6, 186 P. 489, 16 Okla. Crim. 725, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 13 (Okla. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.-

Plaintiff in error was tried and convicted on an information charging that in Tulsa county, on the 17th day of September, 1917, he did have in his possession 898 bottles of beer and 193 bottles of whisky, with intent then and there to sell the same, and in accordance with the verdict of -the jury he was sentenced to he confined in the county jail for 90 days and to pay a fine of 8500.

The evidence for the state is undisputed, -and supports the allegations of the information. An examination of the record discloses that the appeal in this case is wholly destitute of merit.

The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.-

Plaintiff in error was tried and convicted on an information charging that in Tulsa county, on the 17th day of September, 1917, he did have in his possession 898 bottles of beer and 193 bottles of whisky, with intent then and there to sell the same, and in accordance with the verdict of -the jury he was sentenced to he confined in the county jail for 90 days and to pay a fine of 8500.

The evidence for the state is undisputed, -and supports the allegations of the information. An examination of the record discloses that the appeal in this case is wholly destitute of merit.

The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1920 OK CR 6, 186 P. 489, 16 Okla. Crim. 725, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miles-v-state-oklacrimapp-1920.