Miles v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Miles v. State

1919 OK CR 87, 179 P. 784, 15 Okla. Crim. 680, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 100

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 5, 1919

DocketNo. A-3206.

StatusPublished

This text of 1919 OK CR 87 (Miles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miles v. State, 1919 OK CR 87, 179 P. 784, 15 Okla. Crim. 680, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 100 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The information in this case jointly charges that Billy Miles and Pinlca Patton did have in their possession 336 one-half pints of whisky with intent to sell the same. On the trial ,the jury returned a verdict, finding Billy Miles, who pleads, as “W. P. Miles,” guilty, and fixed his punishment at a fine of $250 and imprisonment in the county jail for 60 days. Erom the judgment rendered on the verdict an appeal by transcript with case-made attached was taken. When the case was called for final submission, the Attorney General moved to affirm for failure to prosecute the appeal, in that no brief has been filed and no appearance made on behalf of the plaintiff in error in this court. The motion to affirm is sustained, and the cause remanded to the trial court, with direction to cause the judgment and sentence to be carried into execution. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The information in this case jointly charges that Billy Miles and Pinlca Patton did have in their possession 336 one-half pints of whisky with intent to sell the same. On the trial ,the jury returned a verdict, finding Billy Miles, who pleads, as “W. P. Miles,” guilty, and fixed his punishment at a fine of $250 and imprisonment in the county jail for 60 days. Erom the judgment rendered on the verdict an appeal by transcript with case-made attached was taken. When the case was called for final submission, the Attorney General moved to affirm for failure to prosecute the appeal, in that no brief has been filed and no appearance made on behalf of the plaintiff in error in this court. The motion to affirm is sustained, and the cause remanded to the trial court, with direction to cause the judgment and sentence to be carried into execution. Mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1919 OK CR 87, 179 P. 784, 15 Okla. Crim. 680, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miles-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.