Miles Shoe Co. v. Williams
109 S.E. 888, 118 S.C. 19
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
This is an appeal from an order striking out certain answers as sham and frivolous.
The ruling of his Honor, the Circuit Judge, is fully sustained by the cases of Germofert Co. v. Castles, 97 S. C., 398; 81 S. E., 665; Interstate Ch. Cor. v. Farmington Cor., 100 S. C., 196; 84 S. E., 710, and Bank v. Fripp, 101 S. C., 185; 85 S. E., 1070.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miles Shoe Co. v. Williams, 109 S.E. 888, 118 S.C. 19 (S.C. 1921).
109 S.E. 888 (Miles Shoe Co. v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bank of Johnston v. Fripp
85 S.E. 1070 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1915)
Germofert Mfg. Co. v. Castles
81 S.E. 665 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1914)
Interstate Chemical Corp. v. Farmington Corp.
84 S.E. 710 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1915)