Bank of Johnston v. Fripp
85 S.E. 1070, 101 S.C. 185, 1915 S.C. LEXIS 157
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
*193 This is an appeal from an order striking out certain allegations of the answers on the ground that they were sham, and in allowing the plaintiff to apply for judgment by default.
The riding of his Honor, the presiding Judge, is fully sustained by the cases of Germofert Co. v. Castles, 97 S. C. 398, 81 S. E. 665, and Interstate Ch. Cor. v. Farmington Cor., 100 S. C. 196, 84 S. E. 710.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bank of Johnston v. Fripp, 85 S.E. 1070, 101 S.C. 185, 1915 S.C. LEXIS 157 (S.C. 1915).
85 S.E. 1070 (Bank of Johnston v. Fripp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bank of Fort Mill v. Rollins
61 S.E.2d 41 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1950)
Etiwan Fertilizer Co. v. Jones
24 S.E.2d 74 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1943)
Burkhalter v. Townsend
138 S.E. 34 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1927)
Union Guano Company v. Garrison
126 S.E. 133 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1924)
Read Phosphate Co. v. Jenkins
113 S.E. 317 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1922)
Bank of Enoree v. Yarborough
113 S.E. 313 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1922)
Miles Shoe Co. v. Williams
109 S.E. 888 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1921)
Miller Shoe Co. v. Williams
109 S.E. 888 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1921)
Adams v. Fripp
94 S.E. 109 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1917)