Mikey's Houses LLC v. Bank of America, N.A.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Mikey's Houses LLC v. Bank of America, N.A.

278 S.W.3d 927, 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 2653, 2009 WL 976018

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedApril 7, 2009

Docket2-05-397-CV

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 278 S.W.3d 927 (Mikey's Houses LLC v. Bank of America, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mikey's Houses LLC v. Bank of America, N.A., 278 S.W.3d 927, 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 2653, 2009 WL 976018 (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinions

[928]*928JUDGMENT AND ORDER VACATING OPINION AND JUDGMENT, RECALLING MANDATE, AND ISSUING NEW MANDATE

TERRIE LIVINGSTON, Justice.

We have received the Supreme Court’s per curiam opinion delivered February 27, 2009 in them cause number 07-0901. In re Bank of Am., N.A., 278 S.W.3d 342 (Tex., 2009) (per curiam). In the opinion we were directed “to vacate and withdraw the opinion and judgment of May 3, 2007,” Mikey’s Houses LLC v. Bank of Am., N.A., 232 S.W.3d 145 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2007, no pet.), “and to reinstate the trial court order enforcing the parties’ jury waiver.” Bank of Am., 278 S.W.3d at 346. Therefore, we vacate our opinion and judgment of May 3, 2007 and reinstate the trial court’s order enforcing the parties’ jury waiver. We withdraw our prior opinion and judgment and substitute this judgment and order in their place. Furthermore, we recall our mandate previously issued on September 13, 2007 and hereby simultaneously issue our new mandate in conformity with the supreme court’s opinion and this new judgment and order. Tex.R.App. P. 18.6,18.7.

It is further ordered that appellants Mi-key’s Houses LLC, Helen L. Martin, and Joyce A. Powell shall equally bear all of the costs of this proceeding, for which let execution issue.

WALKER, J. filed a dissenting opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[928]*928JUDGMENT AND ORDER VACATING OPINION AND JUDGMENT, RECALLING MANDATE, AND ISSUING NEW MANDATE

TERRIE LIVINGSTON, Justice.

We have received the Supreme Court’s per curiam opinion delivered February 27, 2009 in them cause number 07-0901. In re Bank of Am., N.A., 278 S.W.3d 342 (Tex., 2009) (per curiam). In the opinion we were directed “to vacate and withdraw the opinion and judgment of May 3, 2007,” Mikey’s Houses LLC v. Bank of Am., N.A., 232 S.W.3d 145 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2007, no pet.), “and to reinstate the trial court order enforcing the parties’ jury waiver.” Bank of Am., 278 S.W.3d at 346. Therefore, we vacate our opinion and judgment of May 3, 2007 and reinstate the trial court’s order enforcing the parties’ jury waiver. We withdraw our prior opinion and judgment and substitute this judgment and order in their place. Furthermore, we recall our mandate previously issued on September 13, 2007 and hereby simultaneously issue our new mandate in conformity with the supreme court’s opinion and this new judgment and order. Tex.R.App. P. 18.6,18.7.

It is further ordered that appellants Mi-key’s Houses LLC, Helen L. Martin, and Joyce A. Powell shall equally bear all of the costs of this proceeding, for which let execution issue.

WALKER, J. filed a dissenting opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 S.W.3d 927, 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 2653, 2009 WL 976018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mikeys-houses-llc-v-bank-of-america-na-texapp-2009.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack