Mike D. Lee, D/B/A Mid-South Investment v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Fifth Circuit

Mike D. Lee, D/B/A Mid-South Investment v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

951 F.2d 54, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 75, 1992 WL 751

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 3, 1992

Docket90-4649

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 951 F.2d 54 (Mike D. Lee, D/B/A Mid-South Investment v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mike D. Lee, D/B/A Mid-South Investment v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 951 F.2d 54, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 75, 1992 WL 751 (5th Cir. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing filed in the above entitled and numbered cause be and the same is hereby DENIED. The court corrects its opinion to the extent that it erroneously referred to “releases” in the Daingerfield transaction documents, 943 F.2d 554, 560 (5th Cir.1991); the presence or absence of release language does not, however, affect our analysis of the estoppel issue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing filed in the above entitled and numbered cause be and the same is hereby DENIED. The court corrects its opinion to the extent that it erroneously referred to “releases” in the Daingerfield transaction documents, 943 F.2d 554, 560 (5th Cir.1991); the presence or absence of release language does not, however, affect our analysis of the estoppel issue.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

951 F.2d 54, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 75, 1992 WL 751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mike-d-lee-dba-mid-south-investment-v-wal-mart-stores-inc-ca5-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack