Mijon v. Acquaire
This text of 145 A.2d 357 (Mijon v. Acquaire) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
GLADYS M. MIJON ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
VICTOR ACQUAIRE ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. VICTOR ACQUAIRE, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER,
v.
FRANKLIN LAKES DAIRY, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Messrs. Emory, Langan, Lamb & Blake for the defendant-petitioner, Victor Acquaire.
Mr. Martin S. Mandon and Messrs. Kushner & Kleiner for Victor Acquaire as plaintiff-petitioner.
Mr. Charles A. Rooney, Mrs. Marian V. Rooney-Sheehy and Mr. Gustave A. Peduto for the defendants-respondents Westwood Transportation Co., and Pater Galdi.
Mr. Albert M. Neiss for the defendants-respondents Franklin Lakes Dairy and Howard Van Syckle.
Mr. John D. Morrison and Mr. William V. Breslin for Gladys M. Mijon et al., as plaintiffs-respondents and plaintiffs-petitioners.
Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
145 A.2d 357, 28 N.J. 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mijon-v-acquaire-nj-1958.