Migliaccio v. Midland National Life Insurance
This text of 484 F. Supp. 2d 1355 (Migliaccio v. Midland National Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[1356]*1356 TRANSFER ORDER
This litigation currently consists of two actions, one action each in the Central District of California and the Southern District of Iowa. Before the Panel is a motion, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, brought by the Iowa plaintiff seeking coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings of these actions in the Southern District of Iowa.1 Defendants Midland National Life Insurance Co. (Midland National) and its parent company, Sammons Financial Group, Inc., do not oppose the motion. The California plaintiffs agree that centralization is appropriate, but suggest selection of the Central District of California as transferee district.
On the basis of the papers filed and hearing session held, the Panel finds that both actions involve common questions of fact, and that centralization under Section 1407 in the Central District of California will serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of this litigation. The actions share allegations that Midland National employed deceptive practices in the marketing and sale of deferred annuities to senior citizens. Centralization under Section 1407 is necessary in order to eliminate duplicative discovery; prevent inconsistent pretrial rulings, especially with respect to class certification; and conserve the resources of the parties, their counsel and the judiciary.
Although either of the suggested districts would be an appropriate transferee forum for this litigation, the Panel has selected the Central District of California, because the California action appears to be slightly broader and somewhat more procedurally advanced than the Iowa action.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, the action pending in the Southern District of Iowa is transferred to the Central District of California and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Christina A. Snyder for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the action pending there.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
484 F. Supp. 2d 1355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/migliaccio-v-midland-national-life-insurance-jpml-2007.