M.I.F. Securities Co. v. R.C. Stamm & Co.
This text of 459 N.E.2d 193 (M.I.F. Securities Co. v. R.C. Stamm & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Joseph P. Sullivan at the Appellate Division (94 AD2d 211) except so much thereof as holds that the individual members of Stamm partnership may not demand arbitration between MIF and Stamm partnership, an issue which we deem it unnecessary to reach or consider.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
459 N.E.2d 193, 60 N.Y.2d 936, 471 N.Y.S.2d 84, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mif-securities-co-v-rc-stamm-co-ny-1983.