Mierzejewski v. Torre & Bruglio, Inc.
This text of 729 N.W.2d 225 (Mierzejewski v. Torre & Bruglio, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Linda MIERZEJEWSKI and Raymond Mierzejewski, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
TORRE & BRUGLIO, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the September 26, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and we REMAND this case to the Oakland Circuit Court for entry of an order of summary disposition in favor of the defendant. The Court of Appeals erred in reinstating the plaintiffs' claim on the basis of a duty owed by the defendant to the plaintiffs. The defendant did not owe any duty to the plaintiffs separate and distinct from the contractual promise made under its snow removal contract with the premises owner. Fultz v. *226 Union-Commerce Assoc., 470 Mich. 460, 683 N.W.2d 587 (2004).
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would deny leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
729 N.W.2d 225, 477 Mich. 1087, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mierzejewski-v-torre-bruglio-inc-mich-2007.