Midland Motor Car Co. v. Willys-Overland, Inc.

132 So. 692, 101 Fla. 837
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 10, 1931
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 132 So. 692 (Midland Motor Car Co. v. Willys-Overland, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Midland Motor Car Co. v. Willys-Overland, Inc., 132 So. 692, 101 Fla. 837 (Fla. 1931).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The writ of certiorari herein is addressed to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Dade County reversing a judgment quod rec.uperet rendered by the Civil Court of Record of that County upon sustaining a demurrer to a plea of privilege in abatement of the action.

Though the judgment of the Circuit Court reverses and remands the cause and does not finally dispose of the controversy, the discretionary writ of certiorari was issued herein because the judgment of the Circuit Court directed the trial court to allow pleas to be filed in the cause, which ruling, if erroneous, would require the trial court to *838 proceed in violation of the essential requirements of the law in the ultimate judgment to be rendered.

The plea of privilege did not fail on an issue of fact as in the case of Bishop vs. Camp, 39 Fla. 517, 22 Sou. 735, but was overruled on demurrer which required a judgment of quod respondeat ouster, that the defendant answer over, as held by the Circuit Court, 1 Encyclopedia Pleading & Practice 30, 1 Tidds Practice 641; Painter Fertilizer Company vs. DuPont, 54 Fla. 288, 45 Sou. 507.

The judgment of the Circuit Court reversing the judgment of the Civil Court of Record accords with the essential requirements of the law. Therefore, the writ of certiorari is quashed.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Buford, J.J., concur. Strum, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hauser v. Hauser
93 So. 2d 865 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)
Howard v. Calhoun
21 So. 2d 361 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1945)
Davis v. the First National Bank of Miami
16 So. 2d 46 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1943)
Janet Realty Corporation v. Hoffman's Inc.
17 So. 2d 114 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1943)
Patten v. Daoud
12 So. 2d 299 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1943)
Hallowes v. New York Life Insurance
184 So. 7 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
Hodges v. Lamar
161 So. 81 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)
Grodin v. Railway Express Agency
156 So. 476 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 So. 692, 101 Fla. 837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/midland-motor-car-co-v-willys-overland-inc-fla-1931.