Midkiff v. Bennett

Opinion

1 2 3 4

5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 BYRON GLEN MIDKIFF, JR., CASE NO. 3:24-cv-05550-LK 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 12 v. RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT AND MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW 13 JASON BENNETT, CAUSE 14 Defendant. 15 16 This matter comes before the Court on Petitioner Byron Glen Midkiff Jr.’s Motion for 17 Relief from Judgment, Dkt. No. 42, and Motion for Order to Show Cause, Dkt. No. 43. In the 18 former, Mr. Midkiff requests that the Court vacate its October 15, 2024 Order Adopting Report 19 and Recommendation pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(4). Dkt. No. 42 at 1–2. In 20 the latter, he requests that the Court “issue an order directing Respondent’s compliance with 21 Habeas Rule 4, by filing an answer within a time determined by this Court.” Dkt. No. 43 at 1. 22 Mr. Midkiff’s Rule 60(b) motion asserts that the Court improperly considered his federal 23 habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 instead of 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Dkt. No. 42 at 2. This motion 24 1 repeats arguments Mr. Bennett already repeatedly made (including in a prior 60(b) motion) and 2 the Court already repeatedly rejected. See Dkt. No. 18 at 2, 4–5. 3 Accordingly, Mr. Midkiff’s Rule 60(b) motion is DENIED and his Motion for Order to 4 Show Cause is DENIED as moot. The Court further notes that Mr. Midkiff has now filed 17

5 meritless and/or frivolous motions for relief from judgment. Dkt. Nos. 8, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 21-1, 6 21-2, 25, 25-1, 25-2, 25-3, 31, 31-1, 31-2, 31-3, 42. “Federal courts can regulate the activities of 7 abusive litigants by imposing carefully tailored restrictions under appropriate circumstances,” and 8 frivolous or harassing filings can result in restricting a litigant’s access to the courts pursuant to 9 the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), after the litigant is provided notice and an opportunity to 10 be heard. Ringgold-Lockhart v. Cnty. of Los Angeles, 761 F.3d 1057, 1061–62 (9th Cir. 2014) 11 (citation modified). Should Mr. Midkiff file additional meritless and/or frivolous motions, the 12 Court may impose such restrictions. 13 Dated this 7th day of July, 2025. 14 A

15 Lauren King United States District Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24