Midgett v. Richland Cty. Sheriff

2020 Ohio 3465
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Midgett v. Richland Cty. Sheriff. Read the opinion of the Court — 2020 Ohio 2966
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided June 22, 2020·No. 2020 CA 0045·Published

Opinion

[Cite as Midgett v. Richland Cty. Sheriff, 2020-Ohio-3465.]

COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DAJUAN MIDGETT : JUDGES: : Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. Petitioner : Hon. John W. Wise, J. : Hon. Earle E. Wise, Jr., J. -vs- : : RICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF : Case No. 2020 CA 0045 : Respondent : OPINION

CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Writ of Habeas Corpus

JUDGMENT: Dismissed

DATE OF JUDGMENT: June 22, 2020

APPEARANCES:

For Petitioner For Respondent

DAJUAN MIDGETT - #57301 JOSEPH C. SNYDER 13 East 2nd Street 38 South Park Street Mansfield, OH 44902 2nd Floor Mansfield, OH 44902 Richland County, Case No. 2020 CA 0045 2

Wise, Earle, J.

{¶ 1} On May 26, 2020, Petitioner, DaJuan Midgett, refiled a Petition for Writ of

Habeas Corpus against Respondent, Richland County Sheriff. The Richland County

Prosecutor filed a Motion to Dismiss under Civ.R. 12(B)(6). On May 14, 2020, we

previously dismissed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Mr. Midgett. See

DaJuan Midgett v. Richland County Sheriff, 5th Dist. No. 20CA41, 2020-Ohio-2966. Due

to the following deficiencies, we grant the prosecutor’s Motion to Dismiss.

{¶ 2} First, the petition is not verified as required by R.C. 2725.04. The failure to

verify the petition requires dismissal. State v. Vore, 91 Ohio St.3d 323, 327, 744 N.E.2d

763 (2001); State ex rel. Crigger v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 82 Ohio St.3d 270, 272, 695

N.E.2d 254 (1998). Second, Mr. Midgett did not comply with R.C. 2725.04(D), which

requires a copy of the commitment or cause of detention be attached to the petition for

writ of habeas corpus. Without the commitment papers, the writ of habeas corpus is fatally

defective. Brown v. Rogers, 72 Ohio St.3d 339, 341, 650 N.E.2d 422 (1995).

{¶ 3} For the foregoing reasons, we grant the Motion to Dismiss under Civ.R.

12(B)(6). The clerk of courts is hereby directed to serve upon all parties not in default

notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.

{¶ 4} MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. Richland County, Case No. 2020 CA 0045 3

{¶ 5} PETITION DISMISSED.

{¶ 6} COSTS TO PETITIONER.

{¶ 7} IT IS SO ORDERED.

By Earle E. Wise, Jr., J.

Hoffman, P.J. and

Wise, John, J. concur.

EEW/amc

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Midgett v. Richland Cty. Sheriff, 2020 Ohio 3465 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).

2020 Ohio 3465 (Midgett v. Richland Cty. Sheriff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Midgett v. Richland Cty. Sheriff
2020 Ohio 2966 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2020)
Brown v. Rogers
650 N.E.2d 422 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)
State ex rel. Crigger v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority
695 N.E.2d 254 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)
Chari v. Vore
744 N.E.2d 763 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)