Midgett v. Richland Cty. Sheriff

2020 Ohio 2966
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 14, 2020
Docket20CA41
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2020 Ohio 2966 (Midgett v. Richland Cty. Sheriff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Midgett v. Richland Cty. Sheriff, 2020 Ohio 2966 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

[Cite as Midgett v. Richland Cty. Sheriff, 2020-Ohio-2966.]

COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DAJUAN MIDGETT : JUDGES: : Petitioner : Hon. John W. Wise, P.J. : Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, J. : Hon. Earle E. Wise, Jr., J. -vs- : : RICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF : Case No. 20CA41 : Respondent : OPINION

CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Writ of Habeas Corpus

JUDGMENT: Dismissed

DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: May 14, 2020

APPEARANCES:

For Petitioner: For Respondent:

Dajuan Midgett - #57301 Joseph C. Snyder 13 East 2nd Street Assistant Prosecutor Mansfield, Ohio 44902 Richland County Prosecutor’s Office 38 South Park Street, Second Floor Mansfield, Ohio 44902 Richland County, Case No. 20CA41 2

Delaney, J.

{¶1} On May 4, 2020, Petitioner, Dajuan Midgett, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus against Respondent, Richland County Sheriff. Mr. Midgett claims he is being

restrained of his liberty by the Richland County Sheriff, Steve Sheldon. (Petition at ¶ 1)

Mr. Midgett further asserts he is being “unlawfully detained, in contrast to the Ohio

Revised Code 2945.71.” (Id. at ¶ 3) Mr. Midgett asks the Court to issue a writ of habeas

corpus on his behalf.

{¶2} Due to the following deficiencies, Mr. Midgett’s petition is not sufficient to maintain

an action for habeas corpus and his petition is sua sponte dismissed. First, the petition is

not verified as required by R.C. 2725.04. The failure to verify the petition requires

dismissal. State v. Vore, 91 Ohio St.3d 323, 327, 744 N.E.2d 763 (2001); State ex rel.

Crigger v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 82 Ohio St.3d 270, 272, 695 N.E.2d 254 (1998).

Second, Mr. Midgett did not comply with R.C. 2725.04(D), which requires a copy of the

commitment or cause of detention be attached to the petition for writ of habeas corpus.

Without the commitment papers, the writ of habeas corpus is fatally defective. Brown v.

Rogers, 72 Ohio St.3d 339, 341, 650 N.E.2d 422 (1995). Richland County, Case No. 20CA41 3

{¶3} For the foregoing reasons, we sua sponte dismiss Mr. Midgett’s Petition for Writ of

Habeas Corpus. The clerk of courts is hereby directed to serve upon all parties not in

default notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. See Civ.R. 58(B).

CAUSE SUA SPONTE DISMISSED.

COSTS TO PETITIONER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

By Delaney, J.

Wise, P.J. and

Wise, Jr., Earle, J. concur. [Cite as Midgett v. Richland Cty. Sheriff, 2020-Ohio-2966.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Midgett v. Richland Cty. Sheriff
2020 Ohio 3465 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 Ohio 2966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/midgett-v-richland-cty-sheriff-ohioctapp-2020.