Middleton v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Middleton v. United States

408 F. App'x 688

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 25, 2011·No. No. 10-1978·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Evelyn Middleton appeals the district court’s order dismissing her 28 U.S.C. § 2042 (2006) action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Middleton v. United States, No. 4:10-cv-00088-JBF-FBS (E.D.Va. Aug. 19, 2010). We dispense with oral argument [689]*689because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Evelyn Middleton appeals the district court’s order dismissing her 28 U.S.C. § 2042 (2006) action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Middleton v. United States, No. 4:10-cv-00088-JBF-FBS (E.D.Va. Aug. 19, 2010). We dispense with oral argument [689]*689because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Middleton v. United States, 408 F. App'x 688 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

408 F. App'x 688 (Middleton v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related