Middleton v. United States
This text of 408 F. App'x 688 (Middleton v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Evelyn Middleton appeals the district court’s order dismissing her 28 U.S.C. § 2042 (2006) action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Middleton v. United States, No. 4:10-cv-00088-JBF-FBS (E.D.Va. Aug. 19, 2010). We dispense with oral argument [689]*689because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
408 F. App'x 688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/middleton-v-united-states-ca4-2011.