FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 129
Withdrawal
28 U.S.C. § 2042
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter129 — MONEYS PAID INTO COURT
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 2042 (Withdrawal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 2042.
Text
No money deposited under section 2041 of this title shall be withdrawn except by order of court.
In every case in which the right to withdraw money deposited in court under section 2041 has been adjudicated or is not in dispute and such money has remained so deposited for at least five years unclaimed by the person entitled thereto, such court shall cause such money to be deposited in the Treasury in the name and to the credit of the United States. Any claimant entitled to any such money may, on petition to the court and upon notice to the United States attorney and full proof of the right thereto, obtain an order directing payment to him.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Richard Leider v. United States, United States Treasury Department, and Paul H. O'neill, Secretary of the Treasury
301 F.3d 1290 (Federal Circuit, 2002)
James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Wheaton Glass Co., a Corporation
446 F.2d 527 (Third Circuit, 1971)
Alstom Caribe, Inc. v. Geo. P. Reintjes Co.
484 F.3d 106 (First Circuit, 2007)
Bank of China v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co. (Two Cases)
209 F.2d 467 (Ninth Circuit, 1953)
In re Folding Carton Antitrust Litigation
744 F.2d 1252 (Seventh Circuit, 1984)
Fulton Dental, LLC v. Bisco, Inc.
860 F.3d 541 (Seventh Circuit, 2017)
Russo v. Flota Mercante Grancolombiana
303 F. Supp. 1404 (S.D. New York, 1969)
United States v. Thomas M. Higgins
987 F.2d 543 (Eighth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Ralph Iovenelli
403 F.2d 468 (Seventh Circuit, 1968)
In Re Scott
346 B.R. 557 (N.D. Georgia, 2006)
In Re Thompson's Estate. Appeal of McGrath
192 F.2d 451 (Third Circuit, 1951)
United States v. 8.0 Acres of Land
197 F.3d 24 (First Circuit, 1999)
United States v. Dong Chan Kim
870 F.2d 81 (Second Circuit, 1989)
Reliance National Insurance Co. v. Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. v. Arny Berger
430 F.3d 412 (Seventh Circuit, 2005)
In the Matter Of: Craig's Stores of Texas, Inc., Debtor. Craig's Stores of Texas Inc. v. Bank of Louisiana
402 F.3d 522 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)
Larry E. Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc.
650 F. App'x 741 (Eleventh Circuit, 2016)
Earl Willametz v. Joseph Susi, and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Trustee, and Anthony J. Orlando, Trustee
489 F.2d 364 (First Circuit, 1973)
In Re Folding Carton Antitrust Litigation
687 F. Supp. 1223 (N.D. Illinois, 1988)
World Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Jakubiec
793 F. Supp. 825 (N.D. Illinois, 1992)
Omega Consulting v. R. Deryl Edwards, Sr.
(Eighth Circuit, 2008)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 960; Pub. L. 97–258, §2(g)(4)(D), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1061.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §852 (R.S. §996; Feb. 19, 1897, ch. 265, §3, 29 Stat. 578; Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 224, 36 Stat. 1083).
Words "and the money deposited as aforesaid shall constitute and be a permanent appropriation for payments in obedience to such orders" were omitted, in view of section 725p(b)(14), of title 31, U.S.C., 1940 ed., which repealed permanent appropriations of unclaimed money accounts and substituted authorization for annual appropriations effective July 1, 1935.
Changes were made in phraseology.
In U. S. Law Week, Nov. 7, 1939, Rep. Walter Chandler (Author of Chandler Act, Bankruptcy) observed as to the Judicial Code:
"Among the major subjects needing study and revision are—Numerous procedural changes which have been brought about through adoption of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure should be codified." * * *
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1982—Pub. L. 97–258 inserted references to section 2041 in two places.
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §852 (R.S. §996; Feb. 19, 1897, ch. 265, §3, 29 Stat. 578; Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 224, 36 Stat. 1083).
Words "and the money deposited as aforesaid shall constitute and be a permanent appropriation for payments in obedience to such orders" were omitted, in view of section 725p(b)(14), of title 31, U.S.C., 1940 ed., which repealed permanent appropriations of unclaimed money accounts and substituted authorization for annual appropriations effective July 1, 1935.
Changes were made in phraseology.
In U. S. Law Week, Nov. 7, 1939, Rep. Walter Chandler (Author of Chandler Act, Bankruptcy) observed as to the Judicial Code:
"Among the major subjects needing study and revision are—Numerous procedural changes which have been brought about through adoption of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure should be codified." * * *
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1982—Pub. L. 97–258 inserted references to section 2041 in two places.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 2042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/2042.