Middlethon v. Florida Power & Light Co.

400 So. 2d 1287, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20395
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 30, 1981·No. 80-2224·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

400 So.2d 1287 (1981)

Bertha Bates MIDDLETHON, Appellant,
v.
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 80-2224.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 30, 1981.
Rehearing Denied July 31, 1981.

Marlow, Shofi, Ortmayer, Smith, Connell & Valerius and Joseph H. Lowe, Miami, for appellant.

Steel, Hector & Davis and Paul J. Bonavia, Miami, for appellee.

*1288 Before BARKDULL and FERGUSON, JJ., and MELVIN, WOODROW M. (Ret.), Associate Judge.

FERGUSON, Judge.

An electric utility company is not liable on theory that they negligently installed and used a concrete pole near the roadway where the undisputed evidence shows the vehicle had collided with another vehicle, veered off the roadway and onto the sidewalk, then struck utility pole. See, e.g., Speigel v. Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, 341 So.2d 832 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).

Order dismissing third party complaint with prejudice is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Middlethon v. Florida Power & Light Co., 400 So. 2d 1287, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20395 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

400 So. 2d 1287 (Middlethon v. Florida Power & Light Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Florida Power & Light Co. v. Estupinan
752 So. 2d 727 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Scott v. Florida Dept. of Transp.
752 So. 2d 30 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Miller v. City of Fort Lauderdale
508 So. 2d 1328 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Florida Power & Light Co. v. MacIas by MacIas
507 So. 2d 1113 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)