Middlebrooks v. United States
This text of 184 F.2d 331 (Middlebrooks v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MIDDLEBROOKS
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 178 Misc.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
July 31, 1950.
Douglas E. Middlebrooks, in pro. per.
No other appearances were entered.
Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and MATHEWS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant moves for leave to appeal in forma pauperis from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California denying a motion to vacate his sentence.
It appears that that court has certified in writing that the appeal is not taken in good faith. We are hence without power to grant the motion, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(a) providing, "an appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies in writing that it is not taken in good faith."
The motion is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
184 F.2d 331, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 3084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/middlebrooks-v-united-states-ca9-1950.