Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. Frugé

201 So. 2d 870, 250 La. 1043, 1967 La. LEXIS 2560
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 30, 1967·No. No. 48816·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In re: Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Company applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition. La.App., 201 So.2d 672.

Granted with rule to show cause. See order attached.

ORDER

Considering the allegations of relator’s petition and the provisions of Section 8 of Title 19 of the Revised Statutes,

It is ordered that the Honorables Carroll Spell, Charles Everett, Jerome Domengeaux and Lucien Bertrand immediately fix the above entitled cases for trial or show cause in this Court on July 11, 1967 at 11:00 o’clock a. m. why the relief prayed for in the petition of relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. Frugé, 201 So. 2d 870, 250 La. 1043, 1967 La. LEXIS 2560 (La. 1967).

201 So. 2d 870 (Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. Frugé) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Columbia Gulf Transmission Company v. Hoyt
215 So. 2d 114 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1968)