Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. Frugé

201 So. 2d 870, 250 La. 1043, 1967 La. LEXIS 2560
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJune 30, 1967
DocketNo. 48816
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 201 So. 2d 870 (Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. Frugé) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. Frugé, 201 So. 2d 870, 250 La. 1043, 1967 La. LEXIS 2560 (La. 1967).

Opinion

In re: Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Company applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition. La.App., 201 So.2d 672.

Granted with rule to show cause. See order attached.

ORDER

Considering the allegations of relator’s petition and the provisions of Section 8 of Title 19 of the Revised Statutes,

It is ordered that the Honorables Carroll Spell, Charles Everett, Jerome Domengeaux and Lucien Bertrand immediately fix the above entitled cases for trial or show cause in this Court on July 11, 1967 at 11:00 o’clock a. m. why the relief prayed for in the petition of relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Columbia Gulf Transmission Company v. Hoyt
215 So. 2d 114 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
201 So. 2d 870, 250 La. 1043, 1967 La. LEXIS 2560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michigan-wisconsin-pipe-line-co-v-fruge-la-1967.