Michigan United Conservation Clubs v. Secretary of State

630 N.W.2d 297, 464 Mich. 359
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJune 29, 2001
DocketDocket 119274
StatusPublished
Cited by61 cases

This text of 630 N.W.2d 297 (Michigan United Conservation Clubs v. Secretary of State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michigan United Conservation Clubs v. Secretary of State, 630 N.W.2d 297, 464 Mich. 359 (Mich. 2001).

Opinions

Taylor, J.

The issue here is whether 2000 Public Act 381 is exempt from the power of referendum of the Michigan Constitution. Having granted leave to appeal and heard oral,argument, this Court finds as follows:

(1) The power of referendum of the Michigan Constitution “does not extend to acts making appropriations for state institutions . . . .” Const 1963, art 2, § 9.

[366]*366(2) 2000 PA 381 states that “one million dollars is appropriated from the general fund to the department of state police . . . MCL 28.425w(l).

(3) An appropriation of $1,000,000 is an “appropriation,” and the Department of State Police is a “state institution.”

(4) Therefore, the power of referendum of the Michigan Constitution does not extend to 2000 PA 381.

Accordingly, consistent with Const 1963, art 2, § 9 and an unbroken line of decisions of this Court interpreting that provision,1 the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the relief sought in the complaint for mandamus is granted. The May 21, 2001 declaration by the Board of State Canvassers of the sufficiency of the petition for referendum on 2000 PA 381 is vacated and defendant Secretary of State and the Board of State Canvassers are directed that 2000 PA 381 is not subject to referendum for the reasons set forth herein.

Pursuant to MCR 7.317(C)(4), the clerk is directed to issue the judgment order in this case forthwith.

Corrigan, C.J., and Young and Markman, JJ., concurred with Taylor, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mothering Justice v. Attorney General
Michigan Supreme Court, 2024
People of Michigan v. Montez Stovall
Michigan Supreme Court, 2022
Mich. State A. Philip Randolph Inst. v. Johnson
326 F. Supp. 3d 532 (E.D. Michigan, 2018)
Citizens Protecting Michigan's Constitution v. Secretary of State
921 N.W.2d 247 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2018)
Boler v. Earley
865 F.3d 391 (Sixth Circuit, 2017)
Melissa Mays v. Rick Snyder
Sixth Circuit, 2017
Michigan State A. Philip Randolph Institute v. Johnson
209 F. Supp. 3d 935 (E.D. Michigan, 2016)
Uaw v. Green
870 N.W.2d 867 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2015)
In re City of Detroit
504 B.R. 97 (E.D. Michigan, 2013)
Hammel v. Speaker of the House of Representatives
825 N.W.2d 616 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2012)
Protect MI Constitution v. Secretary of State
824 N.W.2d 299 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2012)
Frank Houston v. Governor
Michigan Supreme Court, 2012
Coalition for a Safer Detroit v. Detroit City Clerk
820 N.W.2d 208 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2012)
People v. Tennyson
790 N.W.2d 354 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
630 N.W.2d 297, 464 Mich. 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michigan-united-conservation-clubs-v-secretary-of-state-mich-2001.