Michael Shane and Joseph Dillon v. Howard L. Buck and United States Postal Service
This text of 817 F.2d 87 (Michael Shane and Joseph Dillon v. Howard L. Buck and United States Postal Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 34.1.8(c) and 27.-1.2. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the basis of, and for the reasons stated in, the district court’s Memorandum Decision and Order appearing as Shane v. Buck, 658 F.Supp. 908 (D. Utah 1985). We note that the Second Circuit has resolved a case raising nearly identical issues in accord with this disposition. See Kuzma v. United States Postal Service, 798 F.2d 29 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, _ U.S. _, 107 S.Ct. 906, 93 L.Ed.2d 856 (1987).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
817 F.2d 87, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 5622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-shane-and-joseph-dillon-v-howard-l-buck-and-united-states-postal-ca10-1987.