Michael J. Gallagher v. Henry E. Catto, Director, U.S. Information Agency

988 F.2d 1280, 300 U.S. App. D.C. 322, 2 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1520, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 12700, 1993 WL 45703
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedFebruary 1, 1993
Docket92-5213
StatusUnpublished

This text of 988 F.2d 1280 (Michael J. Gallagher v. Henry E. Catto, Director, U.S. Information Agency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael J. Gallagher v. Henry E. Catto, Director, U.S. Information Agency, 988 F.2d 1280, 300 U.S. App. D.C. 322, 2 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1520, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 12700, 1993 WL 45703 (D.C. Cir. 1993).

Opinion

988 F.2d 1280

300 U.S.App.D.C. 322, 2 A.D. Cases 1520

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
Michael J. GALLAGHER, Appellant,
v.
Henry E. CATTO, Director, U.S. Information Agency.

No. 92-5213.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Feb. 1, 1993.

778 F.Supp. 570

AFFIRMED.

Before MIKVA, Chief Judge, and STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance, the opposition thereto and the reply, it is

ORDERED that the motion be granted substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in its opinion filed December 9, 1991. The merits of the parties' positions are so clear as to warrant summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C.Cir.1987) (per curiam); Walker v. Washington, 627 F.2d 541, 545 (D.C.Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 994 (1980).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 15.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Altman v. New York City Health
999 F.2d 537 (Second Circuit, 1993)
Gallagher v. Catto
778 F. Supp. 570 (District of Columbia, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
988 F.2d 1280, 300 U.S. App. D.C. 322, 2 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1520, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 12700, 1993 WL 45703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-j-gallagher-v-henry-e-catto-director-us-in-cadc-1993.