Michael Idrogo v. Sarah Garrahan

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 5, 2015·No. 04-15-00328-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 5, 2015

No. 04-15-00328-CV

Michael IDROGO,

Appellant

v.

Sarah GARRAHAN, Et al.,

Appellees

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2010-CI-12389 Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding

ORDER

On May 27, 2015, Michael Idrogo filed a notice of appeal. In his notice of appeal, he complains of the trial court failing to rule on his motion for default judgment. Nowhere in the notice of appeal does appellant refer to a final, appealable order signed by the trial court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(d); Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001) (explaining that a judgment or order is final for purposes of appeal if it actually disposes of all pending parties and claims before the court). Nor does appellant point to an appealable interlocutory order. See, e.g., TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. ' 51.014. Thus, it does not appear from appellant’s notice of appeal that we have jurisdiction over this appeal.

We, therefore, ORDER appellant to show cause in writing by June 22, 2015 why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. We suspend all appellate deadlines pending our determination of whether we have jurisdiction over this appeal.

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 5th day of June, 2015.

Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michael Idrogo v. Sarah Garrahan, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Michael Idrogo v. Sarah Garrahan (Michael Idrogo v. Sarah Garrahan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)