Michael Idrogo v. Sarah Garrahan
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-15-00328-CV
Michael IDROGO,
Appellant
v.
Sarah GARRAHAN,
Appellee
From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2010-CI-12389 Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Delivered and Filed: July 29, 2015 DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION On May 27, 2015, Michael Idrogo filed a notice of appeal. In his notice of appeal, he complains of the trial court failing to rule on his motion for default judgment. Nowhere in the notice of appeal does appellant refer to a final, appealable order signed by the trial court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(d); Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001) (explaining that a judgment or order is final for purposes of appeal if it actually disposes of all pending parties and claims before the court). Nor does appellant point to an appealable interlocutory order. See, e.g.,
04-15-00328-CV
TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014. Thus, it does not appear from appellant’s notice of appeal that we have jurisdiction over this appeal.
We therefore ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant filed a response to our order. However, his response does not point to an appealable order signed by the trial court. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Michael Idrogo v. Sarah Garrahan (Michael Idrogo v. Sarah Garrahan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.