Michael Edward Beseril v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Michael Edward Beseril v. the State of Texas

DecidedSeptember 8, 2022

Docket11-21-00023-CR

StatusPublished

This text of Michael Edward Beseril v. the State of Texas (Michael Edward Beseril v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Michael Edward Beseril v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT

Michael Edward Beseril, * From the 70th District Court of Ector County, Trial Court No. C-18-0904-CR.

Vs. No. 11-21-00023-CR * September 8, 2022

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Williams, J. (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there are errors in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, we modify the trial court’s judgment of conviction as follows: The notations “N/A” are removed from the sections in the judgment marked “1st Enhancement Paragraph” and “2nd Enhancement Paragraph” and replaced with the words: “PLEADED NOT TRUE.” The notations “N/A” are also removed from the sections in the judgment marked “Finding on 1st Enhancement Paragraph” and “Finding on 2nd Enhancement Paragraph” and replaced with the word: “TRUE.” We also modify the judgment of the trial court to delete the $10,000 fine. As modified, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT

Michael Edward Beseril, * From the 70th District Court of Ector County, Trial Court No. C-18-0904-CR.

Vs. No. 11-21-00023-CR * September 8, 2022

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Williams, J. (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there are errors in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, we modify the trial court’s judgment of conviction as follows: The notations “N/A” are removed from the sections in the judgment marked “1st Enhancement Paragraph” and “2nd Enhancement Paragraph” and replaced with the words: “PLEADED NOT TRUE.” The notations “N/A” are also removed from the sections in the judgment marked “Finding on 1st Enhancement Paragraph” and “Finding on 2nd Enhancement Paragraph” and replaced with the word: “TRUE.” We also modify the judgment of the trial court to delete the $10,000 fine. As modified, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Michael Edward Beseril v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-edward-beseril-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.