Michael Duane Zack, III v. Kenneth S. Tucker

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Michael Duane Zack, III v. Kenneth S. Tucker. Read the opinion of the Court — 704 F.3d 917
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 30, 2012·No. 09-12717·Published

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 09-12717 April 30, 2012 JOHN LEY (D.C. Docket No. 05-00369-CV-RH) CLERK

MICHAEL DUANE ZACK, III,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. TUCKER, PAM BONDI,

Respondents-Appellees.

--------------------------- On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida --------------------------

(Opinion January 9, 2012, 666 F.3d 1265, 11th Cir. 2012)

(April 30, 2012)

Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON, PRYOR, MARTIN, and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case

should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in this Court in active

service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The

previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michael Duane Zack, III v. Kenneth S. Tucker, (11th Cir. 2012).

Michael Duane Zack, III v. Kenneth S. Tucker (Michael Duane Zack, III v. Kenneth S. Tucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Michael Duane Zack, III v. Kenneth S. Tucker
666 F.3d 1265 (Eleventh Circuit, 2012)