Michael Duane Zack, III v. Kenneth S. Tucker
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 09-12717 April 30, 2012 JOHN LEY (D.C. Docket No. 05-00369-CV-RH) CLERK
MICHAEL DUANE ZACK, III,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
KENNETH S. TUCKER, PAM BONDI,
Respondents-Appellees.
--------------------------- On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida --------------------------
(Opinion January 9, 2012, 666 F.3d 1265, 11th Cir. 2012)
(April 30, 2012)
Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON, PRYOR, MARTIN, and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case
should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in this Court in active
service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The
previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Michael Duane Zack, III v. Kenneth S. Tucker (Michael Duane Zack, III v. Kenneth S. Tucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.