Michael Cassidy v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
• Decided: December 26, 2024
• Docket: A25A0680
• Status: Published

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ December 26, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25A0680. MICHAEL CASSIDY v. THE STATE.

In 2022, Michael Cassidy was convicted of child molestation. Cassidy filed a motion for new trial, which the trial court denied on July 10, 2024. Cassidy then filed a motion for an out-of-time appeal, which the trial court granted on October 9, 2024. Cassidy filed a notice of appeal. In Cook v. State, 313 Ga. 471, 506 (5) (870 SE2d 758) (2022), the Supreme Court eliminated the out-of-time appeal procedure in trial courts, holding that a trial court is “without jurisdiction to decide [a] motion for out-of-time appeal” on the merits because “there was and is no legal authority for motions for out-of-time appeal in trial courts.” The Supreme Court also concluded that this holding applies to “all cases that are currently on direct review or otherwise not yet final[,]” id., and directed that “pending and future motions for out-of-time appeals in trial courts should be dismissed, and trial court orders that have decided such motions on the merits . . . should be vacated if direct review of the case remains pending or if the case is otherwise not final.” Id. at 505 (4). Compare Cambron v. Canal Ins. Co., 246 Ga. 147, 148-149 (1) (269 SE2d 426) (1980) (a trial court may exercise jurisdiction over a motion brought under OCGA § 9-11-60 (g) to set aside a judgment upon a finding that notice of the judgment was not provided as required under OCGA § 15-6-21 (c)), overruled in part by Wright v. Young, 297 Ga. 683, 684, n. 3 (777 SE2d 475) (2015); State v. Rahaman, 371 Ga. App. 810, 811-813 (1) (903 SE2d 276) (2024) (the rule set forth in Cambron also applies to motions for set aside in criminal cases and has not been overruled by Cook). In light of Cook, Cassidy had no right to file a motion for an out-of-time appeal in the trial court. See Rutledge v. State, 313 Ga. 460, 461 (870 SE2d 720) (2022). Accordingly, the trial court’s order granting Cassidy’s motion for an out-of-time appeal is VACATED, and this case is REMANDED for the entry of an order dismissing his motion for an out-of-time appeal.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 12/26/2024 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.