Micah Jackson v. State of Arkansas

2025 Ark. App. 480
CourtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas
DecidedOctober 22, 2025
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2025 Ark. App. 480 (Micah Jackson v. State of Arkansas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Micah Jackson v. State of Arkansas, 2025 Ark. App. 480 (Ark. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Cite as 2025 Ark. App. 480 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CR-25-33

Opinion Delivered October 22, 2025 MICAH JACKSON APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE CRAWFORD COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V. [NO. 17CR-21-74]

STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE CANDICE A. APPELLEE SETTLE, JUDGE

AFFIRMED

N. MARK KLAPPENBACH, Chief Judge

Micah Jackson appeals the order of the Crawford County Circuit Court revoking his

suspended imposition of sentence (SIS). We affirm.

In December 2023, Jackson pleaded guilty to internet stalking of a child. Imposition

of sentence was suspended for a period of eight years, and Jackson was ordered to register

as a sex offender. In May 2024, the State filed a petition to revoke, alleging that Jackson had

committed the new offense of failure to comply with sex-offender registration and reporting

requirements. The petition also sought to revoke Jackson’s SIS in a separate case, case

number 17CR-22-581, in which he was given an eight-year SIS for the offense of failure to

appear. Following an October 2024 revocation hearing, the circuit court revoked Jackson’s SIS in both cases.1 Upon revoking his SIS for internet stalking of a child, the court sentenced

Jackson to fifteen years’ imprisonment and five years’ SIS.

On appeal, Jackson has filed briefs with identical arguments in the companion

appeals. Because the evidence and arguments are the same in both cases, we affirm the

revocation for the reasons stated in Jackson v. State, 2025 Ark. App. 481 (CR-25-34).

Affirmed.

HARRISON and BROWN, JJ., agree.

K. “Presley” Hager Turner, for appellant.

Tim Griffin, Att’y Gen., by: Jacob Jones, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.

1 The appeal of Jackson’s revocation in the failure-to-appear case is submitted as a companion appeal, CR-25-34, and decided this date.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Micah Jackson v. State of Arkansas
2025 Ark. App. 481 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2025)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 Ark. App. 480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/micah-jackson-v-state-of-arkansas-arkctapp-2025.