Miami Transit Co. v. Mowrey

138 So. 481, 103 Fla. 840
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 11, 1931
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 138 So. 481 (Miami Transit Co. v. Mowrey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miami Transit Co. v. Mowrey, 138 So. 481, 103 Fla. 840 (Fla. 1931).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case is before us on writ of error from an order of the court below granting defendant in error a new trial.

This court has several times held that:

*841 “There are so many matters occurring in the course and progress of a judicial trial that, in the opinion of the judge who tried the case, may affect' the merits and justice of the cause to the substantial injury of one of the parties, that of necessity a large 'discretion should be accorded to the trial court' in granting a new trial to the end that the administration of justice may be facilitated; and the appellate court will not reverse an •order granting a new trial, unless it clearly appears that a judicial discretion has been abused in its exercise, resulting in injustice, or that the law has been violated.”

See Ruff v. G. S. & F. Ry. Co., 67 Fla. 224, 64 So. 782; Huston v. Green, 91 Fla. 434, 108 So. 846 and cases cited.

It thus appears that it requires a very strong showing ■to authorize the appellate court to reverse an order of a "trial court granting a new trial. Applying the above quoted rule, we cannot say that it clearly appears that the trial •court was guilty of- reversible error in granting a new trial in this ease.

Affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur. Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hart, Et Vir v. Held
5 So. 2d 878 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1941)
Blue Gray Cab Co. v. Lowe, Et Vir
196 So. 425 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)
Florida Dairies Co. v. Ward
178 So. 906 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
Motor Transit Co. v. Studstill
176 So. 769 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)
F. & R. Corp. v. Campbell
166 So. 596 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
McCain v. Talley
161 So. 66 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
City of Miami v. Bopp
158 So. 89 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)
Phillips v. Garrett
147 So. 857 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
Arcadia Citrus Growers Ass'n v. Supervisors, Inc.
143 So. 603 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 So. 481, 103 Fla. 840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miami-transit-co-v-mowrey-fla-1931.