Miami County Municipal Court v. Wright
963 F.2d 880, 1992 WL 186577
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided July 30, 1992·No. No. 91-3615·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
[881] ORDER
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for hearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:
The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as practicable.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miami County Municipal Court v. Wright, 963 F.2d 880, 1992 WL 186577 (6th Cir. 1992).
963 F.2d 880 (Miami County Municipal Court v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miami County Municipal Court State of Ohio William E. Kessler v. Charles E. Wright, Ohio State Highway Patrol Trooper, No
963 F.2d 880 (Sixth Circuit, 1992)