Miami County Municipal Court State of Ohio William E. Kessler v. Charles E. Wright, Ohio State Highway Patrol Trooper, No
This text of 963 F.2d 880 (Miami County Municipal Court State of Ohio William E. Kessler v. Charles E. Wright, Ohio State Highway Patrol Trooper, No) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MIAMI COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT; STATE of Ohio; William E.
Kessler, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Charles E. WRIGHT, Ohio State Highway Patrol Trooper,
Defendant-Appellant.
No.
United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.
July 30, 1992.
MERRITT, C.J.; KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, and BATCHELDER Circuit Judges.
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 as follows:
The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as practicable.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
963 F.2d 880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miami-county-municipal-court-state-of-ohio-william-e-kessler-v-charles-e-ca6-1992.