Meylin v. Woodford
Opinion
Assumpsit. Pleas, non-assumpsit and payment. Issue on the first plea, and a demurrer to the second. Upon a trial of the issue in law, final judgment was rendered for the plaintiff without any regard to the issue in fact.
Thisjudgmentmust.be reversed. The special plea being bad, the plaintiff had a right to have his demurrer sustained, and was entitled to the costs of the issue in law; yet his success on that issue did not of itself entitle him to a recovery on the merits. There was another issue to be tried, and the rendition of this final judgment, before that issue was disposed of, is erroneous
The judgment is reversed, and the proceedings subsequent to the joinder in demurrer are set aside, with costs* Cause remanded, &c.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1 Blackf. 286 (Meylin v. Woodford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.