Meyers v. United States

S.D. New York

Meyers v. United States

1 F. Supp. 2d 318, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4806

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York

DecidedApril 6, 1998

Docket98 Civ. 969 (BDP). No. 95 Crim. 1141 (BDP)

StatusPublished

This text of 1 F. Supp. 2d 318 (Meyers v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meyers v. United States, 1 F. Supp. 2d 318, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4806 (S.D.N.Y. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

DECISION AND ORDER

BAER, District Judge.

By Petition docketed January 26, 1998, Petitioner moves to set aside his sentence of October 17, 1996 on the grounds that (1) under Title 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) illegal reentry following deportation for an aggravated felony was not a sentencing enhancement provision and required a separate charge and (2) that he was denied effective assistance of counsel as a consequence of counsel’s failure timely to file a Notice of Appeal. The Petition is both procedurally barred and merit-less.

Effective April 24, 1996, motions filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 are subject to a one year statute of limitations. The present motion was not filed until January 26, 1998 and is, therefore, untimely.

Moreover, the Petition lacks merit. Petitioner contends that the aggravated felony provision under Title 8, U.S.C. § 1326 was required to be specifically pled. On March 24, 1998 the Supreme Court decided Almendarez-Torres v. United States, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998) and held that the aggravated felony provision of § 1326 was a sentencing enhancement provision that need not be specifically pled. Had the Petition been timely, the Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres would have precluded the relief sought herein.

Petitioner’s contentions regarding his late appeal were previously considered by both this Court and the United States Court of Appeals and were rejected. This issue presents no constitutional question under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

The Petition is denied in all respects. The Clerk shall enter a final judgment.

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DECISION AND ORDER

BAER, District Judge.

By Petition docketed January 26, 1998, Petitioner moves to set aside his sentence of October 17, 1996 on the grounds that (1) under Title 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) illegal reentry following deportation for an aggravated felony was not a sentencing enhancement provision and required a separate charge and (2) that he was denied effective assistance of counsel as a consequence of counsel’s failure timely to file a Notice of Appeal. The Petition is both procedurally barred and merit-less.

Effective April 24, 1996, motions filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 are subject to a one year statute of limitations. The present motion was not filed until January 26, 1998 and is, therefore, untimely.

Moreover, the Petition lacks merit. Petitioner contends that the aggravated felony provision under Title 8, U.S.C. § 1326 was required to be specifically pled. On March 24, 1998 the Supreme Court decided Almendarez-Torres v. United States, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998) and held that the aggravated felony provision of § 1326 was a sentencing enhancement provision that need not be specifically pled. Had the Petition been timely, the Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres would have precluded the relief sought herein.

Petitioner’s contentions regarding his late appeal were previously considered by both this Court and the United States Court of Appeals and were rejected. This issue presents no constitutional question under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

The Petition is denied in all respects. The Clerk shall enter a final judgment.

SO ORDERED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 F. Supp. 2d 318, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyers-v-united-states-nysd-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack