Meyer v. Sullivan
This text of 742 F. Supp. 586 (Meyer v. Sullivan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the court on the Secretary’s motion to remand (Doc. 13). The Secretary argues that remand is necessary for further consideration of plaintiff’s claim. Specifically, the Secretary seeks remand to obtain the testimony of a vocational expert. The plaintiff has filed an opposition to the Secretary’s motion.
The Social Security Act provides:
The court may, on motion of the Secretary made for good cause shown before he files his answer, remand the case to the Secretary for further action by the Secretary, and it may at any time order additional evidence to be taken before the Secretary, but only upon a showing that there is new evidence which is material and that there is good cause for the failure to incorporate such evidence into the record in a prior proceeding; ...
42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The Secretary’s motion to remand falls within the second category outlined in section 405(g). The court believes that remand for the consideration of the opinions of a vocational expert is proper.
IT IS BY THE COURT THEREFORE ORDERED that the Secretary’s motion to remand (Doc. 13) is hereby granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
742 F. Supp. 586, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10637, 1990 WL 118239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyer-v-sullivan-ksd-1990.