Meyer v. Southampton Art Partners, Inc.
This text of 199 A.D.2d 222 (Meyer v. Southampton Art Partners, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered on or about November 24, 1992, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint with prejudice, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Dismissal of the complaint is appropriate when a plaintiff repeatedly and willfully disobeys the court’s successive discovery orders (Kogan v Royal Indem. Co., 179 AD2d 399). Since plaintiff herein repeatedly failed to appear at scheduled depositions, it was not an abuse of discretion for the court to dismiss the complaint. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
199 A.D.2d 222, 606 N.Y.S.2d 7, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyer-v-southampton-art-partners-inc-nyappdiv-1993.