Jack Gell & Co. v. Kass

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jack Gell & Co. v. Kass

223 A.D.2d 477, 636 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 548

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 25, 1996·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.), entered May 24, 1994, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The IAS Court properly exercised its discretion in dismissing this action, which was commenced in 1983, in light of plaintiffs [478] practice of ignoring court-ordered discovery deadlines, its failure to file a note of issue as previously ordered and the absence of a reasonable excuse for its failure to comply with prior orders (see, Meyer v Southampton Art Partners, 199 AD2d 222). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Wallach, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.), entered May 24, 1994, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The IAS Court properly exercised its discretion in dismissing this action, which was commenced in 1983, in light of plaintiffs [478] practice of ignoring court-ordered discovery deadlines, its failure to file a note of issue as previously ordered and the absence of a reasonable excuse for its failure to comply with prior orders (see, Meyer v Southampton Art Partners, 199 AD2d 222). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Wallach, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.

Jack Gell & Co. v. Kass, 223 A.D.2d 477, 636 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 548 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

223 A.D.2d 477 (Jack Gell & Co. v. Kass) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related