Meyer v. Roth

198 So. 2d 29, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3862
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 26, 1967·No. No. 35850·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. After argument and upon further consideration, we have determined the writ was [30]*30improvidently issued. The writ must be and is discharged and the petition is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Meyer v. Roth, 198 So. 2d 29, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3862 (Fla. 1967).

198 So. 2d 29 (Meyer v. Roth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Faber v. Gold
557 So. 2d 105 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Dovenmuehle, Inc. v. LAWYERS TITLE INS.
478 So. 2d 423 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)