Faber v. Gold
557 So. 2d 105, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 686, 1990 WL 8648
Opinion
The trial court properly entered summary judgment for the appellees on the ground that the statute of limitations barred the claims asserted. See Dovenmuehle, Inc. v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp., 478 So.2d 423 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Gaines v. Treasure Salvors, Inc., 352 So.2d 929 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Meyer v. Roth, 189 So.2d 515 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966), cert. denied, 198 So.2d 29 (Fla.1967). We do not consider the other grounds advanced for affirmance.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Faber v. Gold, 557 So. 2d 105, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 686, 1990 WL 8648 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
557 So. 2d 105 (Faber v. Gold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dovenmuehle, Inc. v. LAWYERS TITLE INS.
478 So. 2d 423 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Meyer v. Roth
189 So. 2d 515 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Meyer v. Roth
198 So. 2d 29 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1967)
Gaines v. Treasure Salvors, Inc.
352 So. 2d 929 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)