Faber v. Gold
This text of 557 So. 2d 105 (Faber v. Gold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial court properly entered summary judgment for the appellees on the ground that the statute of limitations barred the claims asserted. See Dovenmuehle, Inc. v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp., 478 So.2d 423 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Gaines v. Treasure Salvors, Inc., 352 So.2d 929 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Meyer v. Roth, 189 So.2d 515 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966), cert. denied, 198 So.2d 29 (Fla.1967). We do not consider the other grounds advanced for affirmance.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
557 So. 2d 105, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 686, 1990 WL 8648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faber-v-gold-fladistctapp-1990.