Meyer v. James

1911 OK 174, 115 P. 1016, 29 Okla. 7, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 223
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedMay 9, 1911
Docket861
StatusPublished
Cited by25 cases

This text of 1911 OK 174 (Meyer v. James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meyer v. James, 1911 OK 174, 115 P. 1016, 29 Okla. 7, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 223 (Okla. 1911).

Opinion

HAYES, J.

This action was originally begun in a justice court of Creek county by defendant in error filing therein his bill of particulars, in which he alleged that he had sold and delivered to defendant therein a bill of goods amounting to $128.50, and that plaintiff in error had failed .and refused to pay for same. Plaintiff in error filed his answer, denying generally and specifically plaintiff’s allegations in his bill of particulars. The trial in the justice court resulted in a judgment for defendant in error, from which appeal was taken to the county court, in which court trial also resulted in judgment in favor of defendant in error. To reverse the judgment of the county court, plaintiff in error complains in his brief in this proceeding only of- errors alleged to have occurred during the progress of the trial court below.

There was a motion for a new trial by plaintiff in error, which was overruled by the trial court; but the action of the trial court in overruling a motion for a new trial has not been assigned as error in plaintiff in error’s petition in error in this court, and therefore none of the matters urged in his brief can *8 be considered. AVhere appellant' fails, to assign as error the overruling of his motion for a new trial in his petition in error, no question which seeks to review errors alleged to have occurred during the progress of the trial in the court below is properly presented to this court. Morton et al. v. Gassert, 17 Okla. 177, 87 Pac. 586.

Proceeding in error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pleasant v. Allen Bros.
1937 OK 459 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1937)
Philip Carey Co. v. Vickers
1916 OK 155 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)
Nichols v. Dexter
1915 OK 848 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)
Lewis v. Lynde-Bowman-Darby Co.
1915 OK 666 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)
Tulsa Fuel & Mfg. Co. v. McCarty
150 P. 700 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)
In Re McGannon's Estate
1915 OK 492 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)
Beugler v. Polk
1915 OK 296 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)
Bice v. Myers
1914 OK 464 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)
O'Neil v. James
1914 OK 190 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)
Board of Com'rs of Beaver County v. Langston
1914 OK 137 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)
Turner v. First Nat. Bank
1914 OK 133 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)
Jennings Co. v. Dyer
1914 OK 89 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)
Adams v. Norton
1914 OK 74 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)
St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Davis
1913 OK 409 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)
Smith v. Alva State Bank
1913 OK 188 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)
Butler v. Oklahoma State Bank of Durant
1913 OK 6 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)
St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Dyer
1912 OK 736 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Lee v. Summers
1912 OK 730 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Southern Surety Co. v. State
1912 OK 652 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Hunter v. Hines
1912 OK 610 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1911 OK 174, 115 P. 1016, 29 Okla. 7, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyer-v-james-okla-1911.