Lewis v. Lynde-Bowman-Darby Co.
This text of 1915 OK 666 (Lewis v. Lynde-Bowman-Darby Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*272 Opinion by
(after stating the facts as above). It has been repeatedly held by this court that, to have errors occurring at the trial of a case reviewed by this court, a motion for a new trial must have been filed and acted on by the trial court, and exceptions saved to the judgment of the court in passing on the motion for a new trial. Martin v. Gassert, 17 Okla. 177, 87 Pac. 586; Meyer v. James, 29 Okla. 7, 115 Pac. 1016; Board of Com’rs of Beaver County v. Langston, 41 Okla. 715, 139 Pac. 956. No motion for a new trial having been filed in this case, and all of the alleged errors complained of having occurred at the trial, the appeal should be dismissed.»
We therefore recommend that the appeal be dismissed.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1915 OK 666, 151 P. 1045, 51 Okla. 271, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-lynde-bowman-darby-co-okla-1915.